Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02154
Original file (BC 2013 02154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02154
	XXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded 
to honorable.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

After being separated for 24 years, he has led a responsible 
life; has had no run-ins with the law and is a proud father of a 
14 year old daughter.  He has been a proud veteran and a law 
abiding citizen.

The minor disciplinary infractions were related to a lack of 
maintaining proper Body Mass Index (BMI).  Currently, he is 
health and fitness oriented and has plans in the near future to 
become a certified fitness trainer and opening his own business.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 14 Nov 89, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force 
for a period of four years.  

On 12 Sep 91, the squadron commander notified the applicant of 
administrative discharge action for misconduct, specifically for 
minor disciplinary infractions.  For a full list of the 
offenses, please see the commander’s notification letter at 
Exhibit B.  After consulting with counsel and having been 
advised of his rights, the applicant waived his right to submit 
statements in his own behalf.  On 27 Sep 91, the staff judge 
advocate found the case file legally sufficient and recommended 
the applicant receive a general discharge without probation and 
rehabilitation (P&R).  On 30 Sep 91, the discharge authority 
approved the general discharge without P&R.

On 21 Oct 91, the applicant was discharged by reason of 
misconduct – pattern of minor disciplinary infractions, with 
service characterized as general (under honorable conditions).  
He was credited with 1 year, 11 months, and 8 days of active 
duty service.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice 
that occurred during the discharge process.  Based on the 
available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was 
consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge 
regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority.  
The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to 
believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the 
provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or 
disproportionate to the offenses committed.  In the interest of 
justice we considered upgrading the characterization of 
applicant’s discharge based on clemency; however, after 
considering his overall record of service, the numerous 
infractions which led to his administrative separation and the 
lack of post-service documentation, we are not persuaded that an 
upgrade on this basis is warranted.  Should the applicant 
provide  evidence pertaining to his post-service activities, we 
would be willing to reconsider his request.  In the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to 
recommend granting the relief sought.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-02154 in Executive Session on 4 Mar and 5 Mar 14, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 Apr 13. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.




                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00475

    Original file (BC-2013-00475.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGM) is awarded to Air Force enlisted personnel during a three-year period of active military service or for a one-year period of service during a time of war. The evidence of record reflects that the applicant was not capable of meeting Air Force standards, as such, we find no basis to recommend award of the AFGCM. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02431

    Original file (BC 2013 02431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02431 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the characterization of the applicant’s discharge based on clemency; however, after considering his overall record of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01961

    Original file (BC-2013-01961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01961 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04322

    Original file (BC 2013 04322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04322 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence which would persuade us that the applicant’s records should be corrected to show that he was reinstated to the grade of SSgt. Regarding...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00790

    Original file (BC-2013-00790.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 Dec 84, the applicant was discharged by reason of misconduct – pattern of minor disciplinary infractions, with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred during the discharge process. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading his discharge based on clemency; however, considering the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03246

    Original file (BC 2013 03246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03246 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 5 Apr 83, the applicant was discharged for Misconduct-Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). In the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01060

    Original file (BC-2013-01060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01060 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred during...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04907

    Original file (BC-2012-04907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04907 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Other relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02978

    Original file (BC-2008-02978.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02978 INDEX CODE: 112.10 xxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable and his reentry (RE) code be changed so he may enlist in the Air Force Reserve. On 28 Apr 93, he received nonjudicial punishment for being...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01453

    Original file (BC 2014 01453.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01453 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the characterization of the applicant’s discharge based on clemency; however, after considering his overall record of service, the infractions which led to his administrative separation...